The Force Is Sorta OK In This One: SWTOR Bucks The Recent Trend Of F2P Failure

Jason Winter
By Jason Winter, News Editor
Share:

Star Wars: The Old Republic seems to be doing well since its switch to a free-to-play model – very well, according to BioWare. But do we have anything besides the company's word to go by?

As we alluded to in last week's F2P Cast, BioWare's claims of doubling their revenue may stem from the game's, shall we say, less-than-friendly free-player restrictions. While I'd imagine that players who do stick around are spending more per person than in most F2P games, the data does seem to indicate a significant boost in the overall player base.

A free-to-play switch is usually like a “second launch.” And we all know how first launches tend to go in the MMORPG world: tons of initial excitement, followed by a rapid drop-off and either a stabilization or a continued plunge, often into irrelevance. While we can't track player numbers explicitly, we can do the next best thing and look at user activity on the game's website, which tends to be a reasonable analog to a game's performance.

Here's the chart from Alexa.com that shows activity on swtor.com over the past six months:

The spike at the far left of the chart dates back to the F2P switch. There's the usual drop-off right after, but then take a look at what happens. The numbers stay rather steady and actually see a notable build-up starting in late February, with the only negative action having occurred very recently.

So maybe most people didn't immediately log in, see how much the F2P implementation sucked, and then immediately logged out. One other possibility is that, even with that large influx right around the F2P switch, maybe people trickled in over the next five months or so, trying and abandoning the game just as quickly – or actually sticking with it.

In any case, the game has been considerably higher over these past few months than it was prior to the F2P transition – a generally good sign.

Take a look at the charts for a couple of other MMO titles that went free-to-play. First TERA (technically www.enmasse.com, as the main TERA site is http://tera.enmasse.com/):

That January jump is from F2P. It's followed by another spike in February, but the game's been in constant decline since then.

Now, The Secret World, which technically isn't free-to-play, but which eliminated sub fees in December:

That fits the standard model of how we expect these things to go: big jump right at the transition, followed by steady decline.

For City of Heroes, we have to use a larger scale:

COH went F2P in September of 2011, which corresponds to the spikes on the chart. There's another spike in November/December, but by the time 2012 rolls around, the game appears to be back down below even what it was prior to the announcement. Other spikes on the chart correspond to the F2P announcement (June 2011), the shutdown announcement (August 2012), and the actual shutdown (November 2012).

Finally, take a look at DC Universe Online, which has been trumpeted by Sony Online Entertainment as a successful title since going free-to-play:

That's not too bad; the game's stayed fairly steady in the period starting about two months after its F2P switch in late 2011.

Again, none of these charts are hard-and-fast indicators of how many players are in a game, but in the absence of any other solid information – which can generally only be provided by a developer, no matter how much we regular players might think we know – they're as good an indicator of a game's health as we're likely to get.

Going by this data, though, none of the other titles we looked at have performed as well as The Old Republic has, growing its traffic numbers for nearly five months following its F2P transition (after the initial, unavoidable drop-off). SWTOR might take years to make good on its initial investment, but at least for the moment, it seems to be doing relatively well, its recent dip notwithstanding. Will that be the new trend, and will the game decline over the next few months? We'll just have to wait and find out.

Share this Article:


About the Author

Jason Winter
Jason Winter, News Editor

Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.

More Stories by Jason Winter

Discussion (31)

Theo Nguyen 11 years ago
I honestly like the game, even if you are a F2P. I guess that's just me and because I'm really dedicated to the game. But I can agree that the restrictions are really annoying. I find the game rather well done. It may be grinding at times but the story element and the conversations they put in the game keep me playing. If they took out the restrictions, it would be more enjoyable.

Lekku 11 years ago
A remarkably poor game, made worse with a cash shop that now is linked everywhere, and only extended a little with the latest expansion.

It's stories, classes, raids and crafting system might keep you entertained for approximately a month or two, if you are a subscriber, but the game will leave a rather bitter taste for anyone who has played mmorpgs before.

And this is all from a previous subscribers point of view. Add the ridiculous free-to-play restrictions to it, and you have the full picture.

BW had few decent ideas, but messed up big time here. It certainly feels like all the updates from hereon are just for the purpose of softening the blow after spending $200m on it, and that happens by milking players, subscribers and f2p, in every possible way.

It is possible to get most of out of the game without paying a cent, but it takes a lot of grind, planning, and some subscriber friends. Ironically, it may actually make the game more interesting.

Zhao Yun 11 years ago
This is...different it doesnt change my overall opinion for SWTOR whatsoever but its interesting how i though this game will fail hard for f2p players if they dont "loosen up" their restrictions but its still going good.Really interesting good job Jason

View 1 reply
Bleh 11 years ago
I just want to throw this out here about SWTOR that I think most people don't realize about the game is that you can buy Cartel Items from players on the trade market with the in game currency including unlocks for the restrictions most people always complain about such as hiding your helmet lol which is silly imo as well but it cost barely any creds to get, there is a credit cap for ftpp but there is only a few unlocks that are higher then the cap which are usually unlocks for your entire account or mounts, just the character unlocks on restrictions etc are fairly cheap, and even the items higher then the cap you can get trading items for it instead of creds, Most the restrictions you wont even notice anyways if your a casual player in the first place, and while your leveling you will have most everything unlocked before you even get to max level, a lot of players and guild will even help you buy unlocks because they really are not expensive at all and in game currency is really easy to get.

View 1 reply
Nyro 11 years ago
Wait....the graphs are based on a game sites traffic? I bet we can think of 20+ games that are 100% healthy and have very innactive sites compared to other games.

Jr 11 years ago
I wonder where LOTRO fits in to the F2P model? I thoroughly enjoy and think for a change wb is actually doing a decent job of keeping it entertaining.

Elias Alexandru 11 years ago
SWTOR is a joke, it states that the game is Free to play, but its not, i have tried the game out and it turned out to be a joke, the game was so restricted that i couldn't even breath when i was thinking about it. some of the most "fun restrictions" are weekly based, not daily, like,dafuq ???? WEEKLY?
i left swtor, because as a F2P player you get bored really fast, literally.
Not worth the time,unless they change their restrictions, they'll probably end up soon dead,as there are so many real "f2p" products that will be released, somewhere arround the upcoming summer we've all been waiting for.

View 1 reply
taugrim 11 years ago
Great article Jason!

Aside from web traffic, are there any good sources of traffic data? Xfire is one, but that only tracks gaming activity for Xfire users, so I use it as a way to compare activity for games on a relative basis.

Bic Boi 11 years ago
Statistics are one thing but morally these guys are as horrible as F2P games come. Just to play as I'd want to subscription-free it'd cost me in the ballpark of about $600 for all the ammenities, tweaks and account features upfront. That's outrageous even by F2P standards. In the long run you're actually LOSING money by playing F2P if you intend to buy anything since I've heard you can burn through this game's content in less than a year's worth of playtime. Even a year on subs is only $180 and that's not including the deal they give for longer sub-time packages.

The F2P in this game will drain you dry if you want to play the game irritation-free and that is my problem--even other hybrid F2P games don't screw you as hard as this one. So while I applaud your analysis Mr. Winter, to me it shows how many people are absolutely gullible and willing to be bilked for their money by those guys.

View 1 reply
Flevalt 11 years ago
Very interesting. Useless statistical graphs. One graph ends at 0.01 the other at 0.08
Mr. Winter might want to become a politician instead of creating optical illusions.
The game activity =/= working results in F2P models

View 2 replies
Adrian87 11 years ago
When SWTOR went f2p i did not even installed it to try it for a few minutes. I knew about their f2p model and i seen no point in losing time with it (even if i pride my self in having tried most of the f2p games out there). I will keep away from that game until it changes the f2p model or until after it dies.

I would also like to say this have been a very interesting article. Even if those are only site stats, it is still interesting to see the patterns. Good job Jason. The force is strong with this one.

Tio_Z 11 years ago
Well in earnest, considering how much money it was making as a sub game (not a lot really, game was heading to closure), when they say "we doubled what we made" means just they stopped getting small penny out of their buck.

Most likely their big influxes in income came from people having to make that one purchase to get a different account type status and at best for some more critical UI/systems they made you pay for. But I seriously don't see this skinning working in long term. At which point they'll probably downgrade it to a more regular type of F2P model, charging for expansions and whatnot instead, thus getting another player-base boost and possibly another income influx.

Cacalips 11 years ago
Like all math, tou can not judge anything by these, it is just a fashion to dress something up. .2 on one model may not mean the same value as .2 on another. One .2 could be 1K players and the other 2L; it is all relevant. Also, Almost all Sub models that go F2P, when doors opened, of COURSE people want to see what the hype is, EVEN if they hated it. I for one go into most games that open up just to walk around, shrug shoulders nad be like: "wow, fools paid monthly for this?"
TERA had a huge influx of trolls. I was one of them. I only logged in to chat. It was good times. Now the chat is back to normal and only one channel a server populated. But all in all, I find myself focused on the game. I am a sticker, but it is my casual fun and fits the fantasy bill right on. The economy is great and the population steady. Allot of corporations skew their numbers because htey need up and up and up. That is why I Say a .2 could be the bench mark of non up period, but that doesnt mean .2 is a dying game. HEll .1 is a very live community....Business alays look to go up and up and up. So these things have to be taken with a grain of salt. The big question is who si paying what?? I joined the Runes ofMagic craze back in the day and spent more there than any mmorpg...so on a chart, that game has fenaminal spending as a F2P, like Perfect World...but over all, there are "better", and more itneresting games...so those anomolies sort of skew these readings as well. I pay nothing so far in the games I play, but paid allot in older dead games...I Will pay when I Get a job soon and will support the games I play for COSMETIC items, because those are the games I like. Not Star Wars, I uninstalled after level 20 super restriction and nothing cool enough to make me want to support it. I do, however, purchase bioware games. I just threw down 30 bucks for mass effect soooo yeahhhhh////

removalmitt 11 years ago
If the game mechanics / gameplay aren't great and don't evolve, then no matter what gimmick / brand you throw in the mix. The game won't keep going strong even if you do indeed update content every 6 weeks or so because it's just the same recycled tired base underneath.....unless the game has a huge fanboy base then....

CBA to search for real stats but I do wonder how they made the comparison 'doubled revenue' since ftp.

View 1 reply
MonkOfWar 11 years ago
I'm not surprised, in SWTOR you have to pay real cash to have an option to hide your helmet...

Gamer X 11 years ago
Wow good job jason .. kinda of strange scales....

Mystika 11 years ago
Well this is interesting, haven't seen something like this on MMOBomb.com before....

Good stuff.

dularr 11 years ago
Good article. Seems to early to tell about SWTOR. Plus you had to resub for a month to get the free cartel coins for previous subscribers.

Pieareround 11 years ago
I like your work, Mr. Winter. I like it a lot.

Boom! 11 years ago
Well its not that surprising the game is more like Pay to win so for some players you have to be a member to fully enjoy the game which sucks...

Insight 11 years ago
Mhm very intresting SWTOR needs to make changes though while it still has time or they will end up declining again


Read Next

You May Enjoy