Video Explores The Four Types of Randomness in Hearthstone
Hearthstone's got a lot of randomness in it. Some people love it, some people hate it. The best players learn to understand it and work with or around it when they can.
In that vein of greater understanding comes a video from Stanislav Costiuc, a.k.a. Farlands, who explores the four types of Hearthstone's randomness. The first two -- strategic and acceptable randomness -- are a little more predictable and offer ranges that most players are OK dealing with. The last two -- double-edged and absolute randomness -- can be more swing-y and unforgiving when they go wrong, and are thus shunned more by "serious" players.
It's an interesting take on the phenomenon in Hearthstone and an attempt to sort out the different types of randomness in Hearthstone. At the very least, it sure beats throwing things at your stream when a Piloted Shredded drops an unwanted Doomsayer. Give the video a watch or read the article on Gamasutra.com.
Related Articles
- First Wave Of London Warcraft 30th Event Ticket Sales Prove They'll Be Very Challenging To Get
- Warcraft Is Celebrating 30 Years With 6 Live Gatherings, Tickets Are Free, But Will Be Limited
- Overwatch 2 Will Run A Few 6v6 Experiments Aimed At Addressing Queue Times Should The Mode Ever Become Permanent Again
About the Author
Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.
More Stories by Jason WinterRead Next
The latest developer diary for Novaquark's sci-fi sandbox game Dual Universe gives players a look at the ship building system.
You May Enjoy
It’s time for another anime collab.
Don’t worry, you’ll be wearing your jetpack too.
We always hear that players did nothing wrong when banned, but this time it may be true for some.
The update includes a range of realistic ships ranging from WWII to now.
Discussion (3)