Trion Upsets ArcheAge players With $100 Hot Tub
Once again, players are upset with Trion. This time, the issue is an item included in the $100 credit pack purchase -- a hot tub house decoration that offers a sleep debuff removal to the owner when they use it. This gives the owner the ability to sleep twice in a day, regaining Labor points twice as fast as players without a hot tub.
To make matters worse, it has been confirmed by players that even though multiple players can hang out in a tub, only the owner can benefit from the debuff removal. Not surprisingly, players are calling foul, declaring the hot tub a pay-to-win item -- a legitimate claim since it will allow those who have it to progress twice as fast.
At present, Trion doesn't seem to have replied to concerns over the item, so we'll have to wait to see how it turns out.
Related Articles
About the Author
QuintLyn is a long-time lover of all things video game related will happily talk about them to anyone that will listen. She began writing about games for various gaming sites a little over ten years ago and has taken on various roles in the games community.
More Stories by QuintLyn BowersRead Next
It seems like there's a "National Day" for just about everything.
You May Enjoy
Voluntary retirements and resignations are on the table, too.
That's a lot of "polish time" for a game that was "feature complete a year ago.
Big anniversaries but no big show is still kind of sad.
An Xbox release is still targeted for later this year.
As Trion can not managed a packet of biscuits as it would all just become crumbs by the time you pulled the first one out of the packet.
I will no longer touch anything published by Trion no matter how good the game is. They are worse then the worst used cars salesman. They manage their games like some 13 year old running a private server.
Do yourselves a favor and stop playing! You will feel so much better.
Now is progressing 5% faster equals to what the article claims twice as fast?
No it's not, it unprofessional I dont like this in journalism.
Also it is biased if the author already knew this.