Albion Online To Address Issues With Hideouts And Dungeons Introduced In Queen Update
A week after releasing the Queen update, the Albion Online team has already announced plans to make important changes to the Elite Dungeons and Hideouts it introduced. The dungeons require tweaks to the loot players earn while the hideout visibility needs to be adjusted.
According to the post on the Albion Online forums, the current rate of hideout destruction is causing issues for smaller guilds that are just trying to get something built. Hideouts are intended to be destructible, but apparently not at the current rate. To fix this, the developers have decided to change how they display on the map, making it so that those under construction only appear when the player looking at the map is actually in that region. The goal is to make it so players are only likely to come across hideouts if there's a reason for them to be in the area in the first place -- rather than simply looking at the map and plotting out a path of hideout destruction.
The post on the forums also covers some other, smaller issues related to the new content including adjusting how players control where they respawn, general bugfixes, and more.
Related Articles
About the Author
QuintLyn is a long-time lover of all things video game related will happily talk about them to anyone that will listen. She began writing about games for various gaming sites a little over ten years ago and has taken on various roles in the games community.
More Stories by QuintLyn BowersRead Next
I guess Sega wasn't kidding when it said that a beta date announcement for Phantasy Star Online 2 on the Xbox One would be coming "soon." Today, we received the news that the test would commence on Friday, Feb.
You May Enjoy
Face off against Limbo and take part in the most twisted Maplemas to date.
Log in to get your Midwinter gifts.
Solo offline mode will be available if you own the title, but you better grab it soon if you want it.
Appointments on both the Epic and Tencent boards are seen as violating antitrust law.
Discussion (1)